nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 03, v.45 101-117
沈阳市非物质文化遗产空间分布与旅游开发研究
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19493/j.cnki.issn1673-8004.2026.03.009
发布时间: 2026-04-30
出版时间: 2026-04-30
网络发布时间: 2026-04-30
移动端阅读
摘要:

文旅融合背景下,非遗旅游受到越来越多的关注,为非物质文化遗产的活态传承拓宽了道路。国内非遗研究针对市域尺度的定量研究、非遗与旅游发展关联性的实证分析相对薄弱。以沈阳市各级非物质文化遗产为研究对象,综合运用ArcGIS空间统计分析工具和Excel、SPSS数据统计分析方法,采用平均最近邻、核密度分析、区位熵、资源优势度和灰色关联分析法,系统分析沈阳市非物质文化遗产的结构类型、分布特征、空间密度、区位熵、资源优势度及其与旅游发展的相关性,并提出相应的旅游开发策略。得出以下结论:(1)沈阳市非遗级别结构以市级非遗为主,类型结构以传统医药、传统美术和传统体育类为主,总体呈现典型的中心区极核分布、周围扩散及点状分布的特征;(2)各区县(市)不同类型非遗的区位熵差异显著,集聚分布状态各不相同,呈现空间不均衡集聚特征格局;各区县(市)非遗资源禀赋和旅游资源优势也有所差异,沈河区与和平区属于非遗资源密集区,浑南区和沈北新区属于旅游资源密集区;(3)非遗数量与旅游相关数据间存在显著正相关,旅游收入与分级非遗数量间存在较大关联,国家级与省级非遗数量对旅游总收入的影响更为显著;(4)未来可从非遗旅游景点、路线和商品开发3个方面对沈阳市非遗资源进行旅游开发。

Abstract:

Against the backdrop of culture-touris m integration, ICH tourism has garnered increasing attention, which further broadens the path for the living inheritance of intangible cultural heritage(ICH). Domestic research on ICH is relatively inadequate in quantitative studies at the municipal scale and empirical analyses of the correlation between ICH and tourism development. Therefore, taking ICH at all levels in Shenyang City as the research object, this study comprehensively adopts ArcGIS spatial statistical analysis tools, as well as Excel and SPSS data statistical analysis methods, and applies the average nearest neighbor method, kernel density analysis, location entropy, resource advantage degree and grey correlation analysis. A systematical analysis was made on the structural types, distribution characteristics,spatial density, location entropy and resource advantage degree of Shenyang's ICH, as well as their correlation with tourism development, and targeted tourism development strategies were proposed. The main conclusions are as follows:(1)The hierarchical structure of ICH in Shenyang is dominated by municipal-level ICH, and its category structure is mainly composed of traditional medicine, traditional fine arts and traditional sports, presenting a typical spatial distribution characteristic of core agglomeration in the central urban area, diffusion in the surrounding areas and point-like distribution overall.(2)The location entropy of different types of ICH varies significantly across districts counties and county-level cities in Shenyang, with distinct agglomeration distribution patterns, presenting a spatial pattern of unbalanced agglomeration. The resource endowments of ICH and tourism resources also differ among various districts and counties: Shenhe District and Heping District are ICH resource-intensive areas, while Hunnan District and Shenbei New District are tourism resource-intensive areas.(3)There is a significant positive correlation between the number of ICH items and tourism-related indicators. Tourism revenue is highly correlated with the number of graded ICH items, and the number of national and provincial-level ICH exerts a more significant impact on the total tourism revenue.(4)In the future, the tourism development of Shenyang's ICH resources can be carried out from three dimensions: the development of ICH tourist attractions, travel routes and cultural commodities.

参考文献

[1]中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步加强非物质文化遗产保护工作的意见》[EB/OL].(2021-08-12)[2024-10-02]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-08/12/content_5630974.html.

[2]习近平.在教育文化卫生体育领域专家代表座谈会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2020-09-23(2).

[3]文化和旅游部关于推动非物质文化遗产与旅游深度融合发展的通知[EB/OL].(2023-02-17)[2024-10-02].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2023-02/22/content_5742727.html.

[4]Rodzi N I M,Zaki S A, Subli S M H S. Between tourism and intangible cultural heritage[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013,85(4):411-420.

[5]Richards G. Cultural tourism:A review of recent research and trends[J]. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management,2018,36:12-21.

[6]Linda G,Maximilian W,Michael R D,et al. Cultural sustainability from the local perspective:The example of transhumance in South Tyrol[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(15):9052-9052.

[7]宋立中.国外非物质文化遗产旅游研究综述与启示:基于近20年ATR、TM文献的考察[J].世界地理研究,2014(4):136-147.

[8]张红梅,盖京平.基于GIS的山西省戏剧类“非遗”时空分布及成因探析[J].山西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021(2):92-97.

[9]张舟,王仲智,林柄全,等.中国国家级非物质文化遗产空间分布特征与影响因素[J].资源开发与市场,2023(8):949-956.

[10]周成,周霖,张旭红.中国非物质文化遗产项目多类别空间分异及其驱动因素研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2023(2):72-80.

[11]鄢继尧,赵媛,郭宇,等.中国非物质文化遗产空间分异及与旅游融合发展研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2023(4):86-95.

[12]何银春,施晓莉,曾斌丹,等.西南地区非物质文化遗产空间分布特征及影响因素分析[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2023(5):628-638.

[13]李江敏,赵青青,陈静.长江经济带非物质文化遗产空间分布特征与影响因素[J].经济地理,2020(12):191-198.

[14]应奎,李旭东.贵州省国家级非物质文化遗产空间分布特征及其影响因素[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2021(5):70-79.

[15]赵巧艳,曹哲,郭炎冰.空间分异视角下山西省非物质文化遗产保护利用研究:基于5批829项数据的分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022(11):183-191.

[16]丁树芳,向云波,许煜.江西省非物质文化遗产空间分布特征及其与旅游发展关系研究[J].中外建筑,2024(2):46-51.

[17]江娟丽,杨庆媛,张忠训,等.重庆市非物质文化遗产的空间格局及旅游开发模式[J].经济地理,2019(6):205-213.

[18]单杰.非物质文化遗产时空分布格局与旅游开发路径研究:基于陕西省渭南市的考察[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023(3):72-80.

[19]孙根年,张毓,薛佳.资源-区位-贸易三大因素对日本游客入境旅游目的地选择的影响[J].地理研究,2011(6):1032-1043.

[20]郝金连,林善浪,王国梁,等.辽宁省非物质文化遗产旅游资源分布特征及利用[J].世界地理研究,2018(1):167-176.

[21]王耀斌,蒋金萍,孙传玲.基于灰色关联分析的甘肃省旅游收入影响因素研究[J].资源开发与市场,2015(7):868-871.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19493/j.cnki.issn1673-8004.2026.03.009

中图分类号:G127;F592.7

引用信息:

[1]蒋璘,石平.沈阳市非物质文化遗产空间分布与旅游开发研究[J].重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版),2026,45(03):101-117.DOI:10.19493/j.cnki.issn1673-8004.2026.03.009.

发布时间:

2026-04-30

出版时间:

2026-04-30

网络发布时间:

2026-04-30

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文